Case Study · Multifamily · Feasibility

20 Units in Dallas. The Job Was to Make Sure the Deal Worked Before a Dollar Was Spent.

How Epex Consulting de-risked a 20-unit infill townhome development on the front end — feasibility, entitlement coordination, civil document review, and investor analysis, with no builder in the room.

Location
Dallas, TX
Type
20-unit infill townhome development
Epex role
Owner-side advisory (feasibility)
Engagement
Pre-construction
Scope
Feasibility, entitlement, civil review, investor analysis
GC involvement
None, by design

The challenge

Infill development is where the ground fights back. A 20-unit townhome project on a Dallas infill site carries risk long before the first slab: title and easement exposure, flood-plain and detention reality, the civil approach to utilities and drainage, entitlement and zoning conditions that can quietly reshape the yield, and a budget that has to survive contact with current market pricing. Any one of these can turn a deal that pencils on a napkin into a deal that loses money in the ground.

The owner group needed to know whether the deal actually worked — not the optimistic version, the real one — and they needed to know it while changes were still free. That is the entire value of front-end work: the most profitable construction decisions are made before construction, when budget, entitlements, and scope can still be moved on paper instead of in concrete.

Feasibility StudyEntitlement CoordinationCivil Document ReviewInvestor AnalysisOwner-Side Advisory

Epex’s role — advisory only, no builder in the room

Epex Consulting worked owner-side and owner-side only. No general contractor was involved, by design. When the party running the feasibility has no construction contract to win, the recommendation carries no builder margin and no incentive to keep quiet about a problem. The owners got the numbers, in writing — and the freedom to walk if the numbers said walk.

How we ran it

1

Land & site reality

Title, easements, flood plain, detention, utility tie-ins, and the civil approach — the site-work costs first-time infill developers underestimate most, priced honestly rather than hoped away.

2

Entitlement & zoning coordination

Current zoning, conditional-use exposure, variance risk, and deed restrictions — mapped against the intended 20-unit yield so no entitlement surprise showed up after the land closed.

3

Civil document review

The civil set read for completeness and for the gaps that surface later as change orders — drainage, grading, and utility routing checked before they became field problems.

4

Budget & investor analysis

A line-by-line reality check against current market pricing, soft-cost coverage, and contingency, run through the investors’ underwriting so the return case rested on real numbers, not placeholders.

5

A written recommendation

Walk away, renegotiate, or proceed with conditions — stated plainly, with the dollar and schedule impact of each issue attached. No hedging.

The outcome

  • The problems surfaced on paper, not in the ground. Feasibility exists to find the issues that are cheap to fix on a drawing and expensive to fix after the pour.
  • The decision was made with eyes open. The owners and investors moved forward on a return case built from real numbers, with the entitlement and civil risks named and priced.
  • The advice was clean. No general contractor stood to profit from the recommendation, so nothing was softened to protect a construction contract.

“The most profitable construction decisions are made before construction. Feasibility work exists to find the problems that are cheap on paper and expensive in the ground.”

The Epex owner-side approach

Holding land or underwriting a development right now?

The feasibility review is the highest-return line item in your budget. A 20-minute call tells you whether your deal is worth a full look.

Book a Project Review
Multifamily Feasibility Multifamily Advisory Case Study: Burgoyne Townhomes